Floristic Similarity Maps of Native Species

 

 

This series of maps shows the relative similarity of the native vascular flora between U.S. counties and selected individual U.S. states and/or regions. Although not exhaustive, we have selected various states to represent each region or the country, and ones that best reflect unusual patterns of floristic similarities. For some states, profound similarities (or dissimilarities) become obvious once their floras are compared. Note, for example, how dissimilar the floras of Alaska and Hawaii (maps #2 and #15) are from the rest of the U.S. For Hawaii, this is quite predictable, with 85% of its native flora being endemic. However, Alaska’s dissimilarity with other US states is far less predictable, since less than 3% of its flora is endemic. Although a high percentage of the circumboreal flora of Alaska is shared with other northern areas in Canada, Greenland, and throughout vast areas of tundra in the arctic and subarctic, only a relatively low percentage of Alaskan species is shared with the flora of other U.S. states (see the seventeen northernmost tier counties of Washington, Idaho, and Montana).

Other patterns of floristic similarities exist between state floras of certain states of the Great Plains (map #13) and the rest of the U.S. flora (specifically the states of Nebraska and Kansas [maps #24 and #17]). For its relatively small size (1,500 native species), map #24 shows that Nebraska has one of the most ubiquitously similar floras of any U.S. state or Canadian province. It has zero endemic species, and there is not a single U.S. county that shares less than 6% of its flora with Nebraska’s. Even more unusual is that only one county in California, and thirteen counties in Georgia shares 5-10% of their floras with Nebraska's; all other U.S. counties share 10% or more. Therefore, it can be reasonably stated that species comprising Nebraska’s flora are most widely shared of any in North America. One might argue that given Texas’s large flora and geographic location spanning both eastern and western floristic regions, it should earn this dubious distinction of having a most shared flora. However, since Texas, unlike Nebraska, is not centrally located with respect to northern and southern floristic regions and has such a large native flora (compared with that of most other U.S. states), many being endemic or near endemic, it is disqualified from consideration.

It may surprise some to see the great floristic similarity that exists between the floras of Tennessee and Virginia, (maps #34 and #38), regarding their shared similarities with the floras of the Great Plains and Texas in these latter two geographic areas.

It has long been known that physical geographic barriers such as mountain ranges, hot and cold deserts, dry plains, or even great rivers can play significant roles in restricting or limiting the migration or emigration of plants into new areas. In certain cases, the advancement of entire regional floras can be stultified or halted by such barriers. The effects of these barriers can be seen via the reduction of floristic similarities between state and regional floras across the North American landscape. For example, notice how floristic similarities of the floras of the Northeastern U.S. (map # 28) and Great Plains (map #13) drop, once confronted by the Rocky Mountains and its flora. Notice too how the dryness of the Great Plains serves as a barrier, thus reducing floristic similarities between its flora and state floras eastward and westward of it. Also notice how the Great Plains serves as a more effective barrier to the floras of the Southeast U.S. and to the Blue Ridge, (maps # 33 and #5) than it does to the flora of the Northeastern U.S. Thus, west of the Great Plains, there is a greater sharing of species with Northeastern flora than there are with the floras of Southeast or Blue Ridge.

There are many suppositions and theories that can be developed by studying these maps. Although I have presented a few of the more obvious ones, please take time to analyze the ones in your geographic area, to see if other, more cryptic patterns or peculiarities can be identified. We would greatly appreciate learning of any theories or suggestions that you might have regarding these maps.  -JTK

 

 

Floristic Similarity Maps of Native Species

How to Cite This Website

(Click each map twice for maximum enlargement)

flora_al.png
1) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Alabama. BONAP©2015
flora_ak.png
2) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Alaska. BONAP©2015
flora_az.png
3) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Arizona. BONAP©2015
flora_ar.png
4) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Arkansas. BONAP©2015
flora_Blueridge.png
5) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of the Blue Ridge. BONAP©2015
flora_ca.png
6) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of California. BONAP©2015
Flora_carolina.png
7) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of the Carolinas. BONAP©2015
flora_chicago.png
8) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Chicago Region. BONAP©2015
flora_co.png
9) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Colorado. BONAP©2015
flora_fl.png
10) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Florida. BONAP©2015
flora_FLPan.png
11) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of the Florida Panhandle. BONAP©2015
flora_ga.png
12) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Georgia. BONAP©2015
flora_greatplains.png
13) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of the Great Plains. BONAP©2015
flora_GL.png
14) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of the Greenland. BONAP©2015
flora_HI.png
15) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Hawaii. BONAP©2015
flora_IN.png
16) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Indiana. BONAP©2015
flora_KS.png
17) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Kansas. BONAP©2015
flora_ky.png
18) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Kentucky. BONAP©2015
flora_mi.png
19) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Michigan. BONAP©2015
flora_MN.png
20) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Minnesota. BONAP©2015
flora_ms.png
21) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Mississippi. BONAP©2015
flora_mo.png
22) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Missouri. BONAP©2015
flora_mt.png
23) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Montana. BONAP©2015
flora_ne.png
24) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Nebraska. BONAP©2015
flora_nv.png
25) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Nevada. BONAP©2015
flora_newengland.png
26) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of New England. BONAP©2015
flora_nm.png
27) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of New Mexico. BONAP©2015
flora_gleason.png
28) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Northeastern United States. BONAP©2015
flora_or.png
29) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of the Oregon. BONAP©2015
flora_PNW.png
30) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Pacific Northwest. BONAP©2015
flora_pa.png
31) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Pennsylvania. BONAP©2015
flora_PR.png
32) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Puerto Rico. BONAP©2015
flora_weakley.png
33) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Southern and Mid-Atlantic States. BONAP©2015
flora_tn.png
34) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Tennessee. BONAP©2015
flora_tx.png
35) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of the Texas. BONAP©2015
flora_NCTexas.png
36) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of North Central Texas. BONAP©2015
flora_ut.png
37) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Utah. BONAP©2015
flora_va.png
38) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of the Virginia. BONAP©2015
flora_wa.png
39) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of Washington. BONAP©2015
flora_wv.png
40) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of West Virginia. BONAP©2015
flora_wi.png
41) Percentage of Species shared with the Flora of the Wisconsin. BONAP©2015

Last updated April 23, 2015.